Hot topics close

The OnePlus Watch 2R blew my low fitness expectations out of the water

The OnePlus Watch 2R blew my low fitness expectations out of the water
Both of our OnePlus Watch 2 reviewers had problems with its fitness data; so far, the Watch 2R doesn't have those same issues.

Marketing for the new OnePlus Watch 2R styles it as a sporty, long-lasting Wear OS watch for "inspiring an active lifestyle," with a lighter design for "those who value all-day fitness" tracking. I love watches that cater directly to me, but my colleagues who tested the OnePlus Watch 2 bashed its health data as its Achilles' heel. So I decided to test the Watch 2R accuracy for myself.

With the original OnePlus Watch 2, our reviewer Harish complained that it "just isn't reliable at daily step counts or activity tracking," that it misjudged burned calories after workouts, and that its stress data was artificially elevated. 

Meanwhile, my colleague Nick did a one-week OnePlus Watch 2 test and had similar complaints about underestimated steps and significantly lower HR numbers during anaerobic workouts. Both Nick and Harish suspected that the watch used its low-power RTOS coprocessor to handle health and fitness sampling and that it wasn't fast or consistent enough to get proper readings.

This made me leery about testing the OnePlus Watch 2R, a fitness watch that theoretically couldn't handle fitness all that well. So, just like my Galaxy Watch Ultra fitness test last week, I strapped on two smartwatches to see how the Watch 2R could match up against my Garmin Forerunner 965 for heart rate and dual-band GPS accuracy.

My OnePlus Watch 2R fitness test

The Garmin Forerunner 965 (left) and OnePlus Watch 2R (right)

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

OnePlus' OHealth companion app doesn't let you export TCX/GPX files like Samsung Health, and I had some issues getting Health Connect to send my data properly, so I couldn't do my usual HR or GPS charts for a direct comparison; I'll use tables as an alternative for now.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Run #1 OnePlus Watch 2R Garmin Forerunner 965
Distance 3.05 miles 3.09 miles
Avg. / Max HR 146 bpm / 159 bpm 147 bpm / 158 bpm
Cadence 161 steps per minute 162 steps per minute
Stride length 3.28 feet 3.35 feet
Avg. Vertical Ratio 8.8% 8.7%
Avg. ground contact time 301ms 283ms
Burned calories 318kcal 421kcal

For my first jog, the OnePlus Watch 2R stayed mostly on track with the Garmin Forerunner 965. I spot-checked heart rates at ten different timestamps, and the 2R matched the 965 four times and was 1bpm short six times, which dovetails with the 1bpm-lower average.

GPS accuracy mostly remained on point. It's difficult to say if OnePlus' dual-band accuracy is more or less reliable than Garmin's since both maps had me straying off the sidewalk at odd moments, but I appreciated that both fell into the same general ballpark for a run with some signal-blocking foliage.

Get the latest news from Android Central, your trusted companion in the world of Android

Running form data on the OnePlus Watch 2R

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

As for running dynamics, the OnePlus Watch 2R synced pretty well for stride length and average vertical ratio, but measured my vertical oscillation as 1cm shorter and average ground contact time as 18ms longer.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Run #2 OnePlus Watch 2R Garmin Forerunner 965
Distance 3,315 meters 3,220 meters
Avg. / Max HR 174 bpm / 191 bpm 176 bpm / 191 bpm
Cadence 180 steps per minute 174 steps per minute
Stride length 4.42 feet 4.43 feet
Avg. Vertical Ratio 6.0% 6.6%
Avg. ground contact time 241ms 223ms
Burned calories 194kcal 229kcal

I ran eight 400m laps for my second track run, and Garmin predictably stayed on point because it uses saved track maps to judge your likely location. OnePlus had more issues: the Watch 2R buzzed my wrist with lap or mile times at about the 350m mark, consistently. It was as if the starting point was completely wrong, but then the GPS was pinpoint-accurate when I hit that incorrect spot. Still, it threw my calculated pace off by a decent margin.

The OnePlus Watch 2R (left) and Garmin Forerunner 965 (right)

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

I figured the heart rate for a hard-paced track workout would be the sticking point, but its HR average was more accurate than the Galaxy Watch Ultra during my track workout last week. It certainly fell short of Garmin's results — typically 1–3 bpm short at a given moment — but typically leveled out to the correct number given enough time. Certainly, the Watch 2R did much better than the Watch 2 in this area.

Again, OnePlus' running dynamics data diverged from Garmin in small ways. I don't quite get how OnePlus said I took more steps per minute while leaving my feet on the ground for longer. However, I realized after my run that OHealth had my height listed as 5'7 (I'm 6'1), so maybe that skewed the results for things like vertical oscillation. Regardless, running form data isn't worth obsessing over, in my opinion.

Overall OnePlus Watch 2R fitness impressions

Post-run heart rate average and max on the OnePlus Watch 2R.

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

This might simply be a case of low expectations skewing my impressions, but the OnePlus Watch 2R feels like a strong budget fitness watch. It has a comfortable weight for its display size, three-day battery life with Wear OS 4, Google Assistant, and a $229 price tag that I'd expect from an Amazfit watch — not something with proper app support.

OHealth provides some in-depth and surprisingly accessible data for running, offering detailed context for certain stats like training effect, running dynamics, VO2 Max, and recovery time — though Garmin wants me to rest an extra day and has my VO2 Max slightly lower. 

That said, it's still quite basic compared to other tie-in fitness apps. OHealth provides a lot of individual run data, but its long-term training load and workout summary data is on the simplistic side. If I used the Watch 2R long-term, I'd most likely auto-sync the data to Strava and rely on that instead.

OnePlus Watch 2 data

The OnePlus Watch 2 (Image credit: Apoorva Bhardwaj / Android Central)

Circling back to my colleagues' complaints about the original OnePlus Watch 2, my final step count across both runs was 11,670 for the Forerunner 965 and 11,560 for the Watch 2R. 

Garmin watches beat every other brand in my first and second step-counting tests, so I'll treat the first number as an accurate control group. About 100 steps off across 11,000 steps is almost a rounding error, and significantly better than the OnePlus Watch 2 vs. the Pixel Watch 2 across the same distance (1,860 short). The same goes for my recent Galaxy Watch Ultra test against the Forerunner 965 after 10,000 steps (348 steps short).

OnePlus did underreport my burned calories compared to Garmin, but to be honest, I've never seen any two watch brands agree on how many calories you've burned. I don't know what goes into that algorithm and how to tell which ones flatter or sell you short. So I'm not too fussed about it looking like OnePlus is on the low end, since it's just an estimate.

Really, my biggest complaint with the OnePlus Watch 2R is the same one I have with the Galaxy Watch Ultra: the lack of a crown. OnePlus gave the Watch 2 an inactive crown that spins and does nothing, while the Watch 2 has two simple buttons, one of which pulls up workouts by default unless you change the shortcut. I do appreciate that, but the sweaty-stained displays in the pics above should show why I don't like relying on swipes during workouts. Give me up/down buttons or a crown any day.

I need more time for a full OnePlus Watch 2R review that dives deeper into the health and sleep side of things. But I'm much more bullish about its chances of being worthwhile for casual athletes than I was a week ago -- and matching up against the best cheap Android watches for quality.

The OnePlus Watch 2R in Forest Green and Gunmetal Gray.

OnePlus Watch 2R

Affordable Wear OS fitness watch

The OnePlus Watch 2R has a Snapdragon W5 CPU, 500mAh battery, 1.43-inch display, dual-band GPS, NFC tap-to-pay, Google Assistant, and detailed post-run metrics. It's not as stylish or rugged as the original Watch 2, but it's much lighter, more affordable, and seemingly lacks the same HR issues.

Similar news
News Archive
  • FIFA World Cup qualifiers
    FIFA World Cup qualifiers
    2022 Concacaf World Cup Qualifying: USA Vs. Canada - Starting XI, Lineup Notes, TV Channels & Start Time
    31 Jan 2022
    4
  • Max Pacioretty
    Max Pacioretty
    Max Pacioretty On Track To Play Tuesday - NHL News | Fantasy Hockey
    7 Feb 2024
    1
  • Mary River Mine
    Mary River Mine
    Nunavut review board recommends against iron ore mine expansion on Baffin Island
    14 May 2022
    2
  • Cody Ceci
    Cody Ceci
    Oilers march on after blanking Kings in Game 7
    19 Aug 2024
    2
  • Shane Gillis
    Shane Gillis
    'SNL' host Shane Gillis addresses being fired as a cast member ...
    25 Feb 2024
    8
  • Virus Chine
    Virus Chine
    China Confirms New Coronavirus Spreads From Humans to Humans
    21 Jan 2020
    1